CMG Holdings Group Inc (CMGO)

[Lenard]

Below is a quote and below that is the actual document it was cherry-picked from and was signed on Oct.19 a lifetime ago considering the case. Below that old news document is a recent document signed on Oct.26 a week later stipulating that the defense agrees to the transfer of documents,computer communications, etc. This is important because the defense lawyer gets to see if his own clients improperly deleted anything. The defendants have wanted this betting there is nothing there. CMG's attorney disagrees. I believe the defense lawyer will find that his clients actual left evidence showing improper deletion of computer files. Remember this is a CIVIL CASE and these foolish defendants are playing it as though the burden of proof is beyond reasonable doubt. They had access to the items and now they are the ones being scrutinized for the care of the items.Defense attorneys do not want to find that anything was improperly deleted. They are screwed. And this quote below is meaningless because of the latest development in the case

PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: The Court has considered the parties’ letters of October 15, 2018 and October 17, 2018 addressing their discovery dispute. (Dkt. Nos. 118, 119.) Plaintiff/Third-Party Defendants’ request for a protective order is hereby denied. Their alternative requests for cost sharing and a 45-day extension of the discovery period are also denied. Their motion for a conference to resolve discovery dispute is denied as moot.

Moving to one week later we have another doc signed by the judge on the 26th of October making it a whole new ball game with both parties agreeing to what it stipulates.