I am not criticizing the SIAF's method of accounting for value. What I am criticizing is YOUR method of valuing the company based on irrelevant facts such as investment at cost which gives little meaning to its true value.
When you start throwing numbers such as in your previous post below, you might have unintentionally misleads other investors to assume that that's what its real value based on investment at cost and get disappointed at the end.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.