InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 1134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2016

Re: Moneydontbuylove post# 27382

Wednesday, 10/24/2018 3:06:33 PM

Wednesday, October 24, 2018 3:06:33 PM

Post# of 47671
Alright let's take a step back. I think we agree on more than we realize.

My post have never been about demanding the company release a copy of the contract. I don't care if they do or don't. It won't influence me to buy or sell anymore shares of this company.

However, when folks to come on these boards and state, with absolution, Mexus entered into a contract with Major Drilling (that was allegedly posted by Mexus but since removed) it is not unfair, "moving the goal posts", or negative, to ask them for some proof of their claim.

When those folks were confronted about their claims, they weren't able to provide the proof to back it up and the games began.

Here is what can be factually proven about the drilling agreement;

1. Major Drilling has stated they entered into a contract with Mexus.
2. That agreement includes a minimum of 800 meters of drilling at Santa Elena.

Any claim about when the drilling will start or be completed by can't be made as the letter from Major Drilling only states drilling is intended to start the first week of November.

That's it. That's all we know about the agreement between Mexus and Major Drilling. We don't know if there was a deposit required, or how much or if it was paid. The originally posted agreement must have had some language about it, but I never saw or read it, and we don't even know if that was the agreement the two parties signed off on.

The company has also put out a PR claiming a whole bunch of other things like, samples will be sent to ALS-Chemex and end goal being a 43-101 instrument. But given the company's poor track record of following through on previous promises/forward looking statements I personally won't hold my breath for those things. Not saying they won't happen, but I won't count any chickens until they hatch.

Back to my original point, I don't care if a contract ever gets shared publicly. I do care when posters try to represent what is in that contract without providing documentation to support their claims. If a poster makes a claim, it's on them to provide the documentation supporting their claim. Otherwise it's opinion and should not be represented as fact.

A certain person keeps re-posting the contract was signed and deposit paid. Yet they have not been able to provide any documentation to support any deposit payment was made, or even necessary). These types of posts will continue to be called out on it until they discontinue making the claim, provide documentation supporting the claim, or the drilling starts.

Not trying paint the company in a negative light. Just tired of the BS that gets spread around here like its gospel.