InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 22
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/05/2003

Re: dasmortes post# 54005

Sunday, 10/21/2018 12:29:11 AM

Sunday, October 21, 2018 12:29:11 AM

Post# of 58838
Wow. Lots of thoughts in this post!
When you refer to a cotton module, is this one marked lot that can be matched to a particular origin (field) and a specific blockchain identifier?
If all cotton sent to a particular gin has been marked by APDN, I would think their testing should be able to provide a list of ALL sources.
I agree that marking needs to be done ultra cheaply. This is not a high margin game but rather a high volume one.
I also agree whole-heartedly that testing needs to be conveniently done in the workplace (not a lab). I noticed in one company announcement for package marking APDN stated that their testing would simply require a swab of their marker, then snipping off the end of the q-tip, and putting multiples of these in a device for testing. This sounds way too onerous to me. What factory or distribution centre would find this convenient? I would rather see a handheld device that you simply point at the product and it quickly provides a readout and/or a printout of the products provenance.
Thanks again for an interesting post!
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent APDN News