InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 4060
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/27/2017

Re: modes948 post# 147595

Saturday, 10/20/2018 1:06:13 PM

Saturday, October 20, 2018 1:06:13 PM

Post# of 163718

a lower shareprice is preferable since it discourages dilution and management has to look for other ways for funding


Ah, now I see your point. Yes, if a low PPS discourages dilution then I would agree. Also, however painful it was to watch the PPS plummet in 2017 it wasn't that bad before dilution because the damage wasn't permanent (it just meant that I could have bought a lot more shares if I had waited), but with dilution the damage is permanent and hence a lot more painful (and unacceptable).

However, it seems that Solomon is willing (or forced) to dilute at any price; if he was willing to (or forced to) dilute at 5% of book in 2017, then he surely will be willing to dilute at 1% of book in 2018 if he needs to... Hence I don't think the premise holds with regards to SIAF frown Our management is unable and/or incompetent with regards to finances.

It would be interesting to be inside Solomons head; was there no alternatives to the dilution or is he a total maniac? Has he sacrificed us to give TRW a boost? Were there some clauses in the carve-out deal that we are unaware of that forces his hand? Is he planning on a buyback-plan to compensate for some of the dilution? Etc etc

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.