InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,544.59
(
-0.78%
)
US TECH 100
19,234.00
(
-0.19%
)
Dow Jones
40,665.02
(
-1.29%
)
Brent Oil
83.90
(
-0.22%
)
Bitcoin
63,569.20
(
-0.62%
)
Post# of 12660
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

iwfal

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 75
Posts 4700
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/06/2003

iwfal

Member Level

Re: rancherho post# 1425

Tuesday, 10/31/2006 3:20:52 PM

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:20:52 PM

Post# of 12660
In the 9901/9902a trials, treatment effect was the most statistically significant.

This is not correct. PGS is correct that in 9901 and in 9902a bone mets was the strongest prognostic (tied with age in 9901). (I have no idea about 9901 combined with 9902a - but I'd be surprised if bone mets wasn't again the strongest prognostic. It probably has to be mathematically.)
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up