SEC likely knows the Courts records already. Lack of filings, not fraud was the basis of the offer of settlement to Company, accepted. Settlements and "Case Dismissed With Prejudice," are not prima facie evidence of fraud. Then calls by investors to SEC offices, and other skilled posters in these matters: Validate that Fraud was not the basis of the revocation. The settlement allusion is to getting current with the mandatory filings.
All of a sudden even that is less expensive. So zero fraud, and better business practice would be said the outcome.