OT - If anyone is following this Q-anon phenomenon, it sure is interesting in its weirdness. I'm still trying to get up to speed, but it definitely has the characteristics of a Deep State psyop, along the lines of 'Occupy Wall Street' but much more convoluted and potentially sinister.
In comparison, 'Occupy Wall St' was a straightforward Deep State sponsored operation designed to head off and discredit the expected public backlash in the aftermath of the 2008 crisis. Fairly simple, and it worked, and in the end all the Wall St banksters had to deal with was Ron Paul's one time limited audit of the Fed, plus the weak Dodd-Frank legislation.
Had a true 'fire and pitchfork' reaction been allowed to fester and grow in the aftermath of 2008, who knows where that could have lead (ban derivatives, break up the too big to jail zombie banks, put CEOs in jail, or even abolish the Fed). But 'Occupy Wall St' corralled these forces into a ridiculous made-to-fail movement, the only demands of which were the right to camp out in a NY park for a few months.
Q-anon, on the other hand, is not so easy to analyze.
(continued)
