InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 3
Posts 135
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/17/2005

Re: Banks post# 97123

Tuesday, 10/31/2006 2:39:23 PM

Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:39:23 PM

Post# of 326355
Banks - that is absolutely correct.

I was only clarifying this statement from N E O M:

It is likely that they know they are going to loose and they believe the Judge will grant better terms to them than NeoMedia has....It is further likely that they want to move on with their business, which would mean they are not interested in colaboration.

I would not read that much into the motion. While it isn't necessarily a bad thing (judge will likely not grant), it isn't a good thing either (they believe they have a strong case).