InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 790
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/09/2018

Re: jross34 post# 33373

Sunday, 10/14/2018 10:46:01 AM

Sunday, October 14, 2018 10:46:01 AM

Post# of 52224
Adam Aaron was recently quoted as stating that 45% of A-list members were not earlier a part of their Stubs program. Again taking that information and their recent growth numbers I am suspecting that those are the movie markets super users congregating over from MP. Also earnings have not been released as of yet. But I have posted a link to forcasts of a .45/share loss for last quarter for AMC. I see only MP as having provided any increase in profit for theaters and producers. The A-list product only provides more movies sessions and less profit. The MP product has been the only service to allow the movie viewer to spend more out of pocket on concessions which is where theaters make their gravy. As brought up to me in a response post, MP has heavy limitations on movie availability. I don't know the limits because I admittedly am not a MP sub, but have thought that these limitations may very well be double purposed. One so they may reduce costs for MP. But also the theater chains may be served by filling seats at lower attendance times. I have read that it is the theater chain that chooses the movies and times of availability. I work as an independent contractor who distributes product for end user consumption. But I consider the vendors my customers, not the end user.