This is not a "theory" lol. It's fact, plain and simple. The market caps of OTC companies vary, and you have to look at the number of outstanding shares vs their market cap, as I have done. The companies on the OTC range at all market caps, and most of them are more heavily diluted than QSEP.
In this instance we're not evaluating the opportunity cost or the fundamentals. I'm Not looking at if QSEP have achieved revs to date, nor looking at what they were promoted for 10 years ago, nor how much cash they've gone through although I know that's all you look at. I'm looking at QSEP's outstanding shares and comparing them to most other companies. The question is if QSEP comparatively is heavily diluted. The answer is is easy. It's no. Especially for being in business for so long.
Unless you have taken a look at the share structure of hundreds of companies the way I have, you wouldn't know as I do that what I'm saying is true. QSEP, comparatively speaking is not a heavily diluted stock. That's a fact. End of story.
Again your lecture doesn't provide any factual basis just more of the same theories that investors have heard for many years. Comparing the share structure alone without a market cap analysis would not be adequate to support any of these claims certainly doesn't explain the wasting of 100M dollars in cash and multi decades of time chasing two separate and distinctly different markets.
a Billion shares OTC penny at .001 is a meaningless comparison. QSep has been at this for 20 years, saying dilution has been spread out or worked off is some benefit disregards the opportunity cost of doing business or achieving a reasonable ROI. Heads roll at Big Board companies when numbers and execution don't measure up.Qsep boys get a paid two year holiday. Qsep has been disappointing shareholders since its inception and isn't diluting to finance orders that are stacking up but are diluting to pay overhead and basically keep the dream alive for another roll of the dice. Beside any reasonable executive should be able to secure local lines of credit and not rely 100% on selling convertibles.
Again here are the shares thatw are issued:
Shares + per year %+
2018 256,013,515 21,036,608 8.95%
2017 234,976,907 42,145,097 21.86%
2016 192,831,810 9,000,233 4.90%
2015 183,831,577 2,803,333 1.55%
2014 181,028,244 4,785,427 2.72%
2013 176,242,817 32,575,247 22.67%
2012 143,667,570 29,394,100 25.72%
2011 114,273,470 22,820,276 24.95%
2010 91,453,194 20,163,798 28.28%
2009 71,289,396
The company previously heavily promoted the idea of uplisting to the NAZ and that fantasy was circulated for quite some time until someone actually read the requirements for uplisting and posted it. It was clear Qsep was nowhere near the minimum requirements and that claim soon vanished. I wonder what the excuse will be when Qsep shares issued hits 500M and the board comes back for other pop.
Report TOS
Moderate
