InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 246
Posts 2992
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/16/2015

Re: Truth022809 post# 193733

Friday, 10/05/2018 7:42:47 AM

Friday, October 05, 2018 7:42:47 AM

Post# of 255668
Try "simply facts, mathematics & algebra."

Everything in it is pure speculation.

What's your basis for this. Oh, yeah - random speculation:

There is about a 1% chance that the product will end up in 1% of the vehicles.

Why not try facts, references, links?

Netflix, Apple, google, amazon, activision, the list goes on and on. Those are innovative companies that continue to innovate and continue to gain more market share because they innovate and create new products and better ways to do things.

Riiigght. Yeah, that's right - Google, the "one off" company with a search engine that so many said was EXTREMELY overvalued when "all they have is a one-off product that will be the end of it." It'll hit a wall and have nowhere to go, while the big winners like AltaVista align themselves with the Cisco's of the world. Amazon... boring, simple, an online bookstore... WHOOPIE, that didn't excite REAL investors who knew THAT would have a very limited future. Apple - a one-off IBM wannabe they said, a hobby computer company... they'll never be mainstream like IBM! No way! They'll eventually hit a wall and have nowhere to go. The list goes on and on.

ONCI bought a couple products from a company...which is great, but it isn’t innovation.

WRONG. ONCI bought rights to market the products, then bought the innovative company that created them while amassing a substantial intellectual property portfolio including 34 patents and apps.

Out can cheerlead all you want, and like I told Dewn boom, I hope All investors here make a lot of money...but a $6 billion company will never be had here.

Cheerlead? Lol. Show me where I'm cheerleading: 99% facts, calculations and fact-based mathematic and algebraic formula-based projections and conclusions on valuation - with references and/or links provided - and a 1% sprinkle of attaboys for Steve, who's done a pretty damn good job with the business.

I separate the wheat from the chaff by sticking to facts. I buy substantially undervalued stock in companies with high value and tremendous growth potential, and I couldn't care less about how other investors feel about SB's communication methods and modes, effectiveness in communication, or his attitude toward certain groups of investors.

I simply share my DD and conclusions with others - if and when there are conclusions, preliminary or otherwise - and often include my opinion based on the facts and numbers that are presented.