InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,319.31
(
2.30%
)
US TECH 100
18,004.00
(
3.53%
)
Dow Jones
39,446.49
(
1.76%
)
Brent Oil
78.81
(
0.08%
)
Bitcoin
61,360.05
(
-0.61%
)
Post# of 146313
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

1manband

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 171
Posts 20598
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/06/2010

1manband

Re: Lucky77Dice post# 45701

Wednesday, 10/03/2018 7:42:27 PM

Wednesday, October 03, 2018 7:42:27 PM

Post# of 146313
That is not the correct interpretation.

The PwC statement was "and is in the best interests of the Company, their creditors, and other stakeholders." Nowhere is shareholder either mentioned, or even implied. If it was, they would be specifically named, just like creditors was (and even there, only 2 creditors are benefiting, but that still qualifies to name the class under bankruptcy law).
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up