InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 970
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/17/2018

Re: Baffic post# 46080

Tuesday, 09/25/2018 11:03:43 AM

Tuesday, September 25, 2018 11:03:43 AM

Post# of 65774
High price for that lab indeed. For a one year old company filed in 2016 at an unkept location. Then took a year to get certified iso, and the wwoser lab isnt licensed by the state of mass. Lusardi sold that company to evio. And it's all private. Details unknown. We're not allowed to know. But that black hole of information is looked at by the noobs as a plus because nobody can find out how bad it is. So you blame me that i dont know...as if to say that i have no evidence that is was a bad deal. But the lack of information indicates that it's a bad deal from my point of view.

Details of the deal is private. No accountability to the stockholders. Price is high because it required a promissory note.

Same with the colorado lab but that lab is real, but will produce absolutely no revenue to evio ever. Again, lusardi linked to the sale of colorado lab for this one sided deal that is bad for evio bottom line. Colorado lab is to share R&D. Really? No revenue at all? No licensing fees from the Florida lab? Where are those license fees?

Now look at Wwoser's consulting fees that escapes Evio revenue numbers.

I await the next lab deal involving a one year old company that is filed and then sold to evio with the lusardi fingerprint. Good for Lusardi, he looks at for himself. And Wwoser buys his labs and doesnt share details with the stockholders. And the noobs defend his decisions. Because they are afraid to question the self deceptive narrative produced within their own minds. And Wwoser plans to buy more labs at what expense? What terms? All private in terms. And who wins from this? And the revenue?