Pluristem Therapeutics Inc (PSTI)

[zzaatt]

I only respond in kind. I never attack you unless provoked....

Ok, rather than debate about who "started it", I will look forward rather than at history and do my best to avoid unnecessary controversy.

My comments of PATHETIC DEAD MONEY are my opinion....they are not rude......they are not attacks on you..

Ok, let's stipulate that (although there seems to be just a bit of needling going on...maybe I'm wrong). In any case, you have a right to be as pessimistic as you wish, in fact, challenging the optimistic perspective is not a bad idea, forces you to revisit your investment thesis, and makes for a lively board.

We obviously have a different approach: I consider the prospect of the company based on what's going on now and what we can expect in the future. The past is not irrelevant, but it's a lot less important for me than where we are and what all the available data indicates.

I also disagree with you about the role of management, which is certainly important, but ultimately the science and success in the clinic is the decisive factor. We're getting close enough to getting definitive answers (trial results), that even incompetent management (iff they are indeed incompetent) should not be able to negate the outcome.

These are fundamentally different perspectives, but I see no reason this board can't accommodate both. I do hope that we all come out more prosperous when all this is over, and I think we will. I assume our goals with respect to the ultimate outcome are the same.