InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,127.79
(
1.26%
)
US TECH 100
17,446.00
(
2.17%
)
Dow Jones
38,675.68
(
1.18%
)
Brent Oil
82.77
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
63,379.72
(
-0.80%
)
Post# of 17377
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

swingingRichard

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 83
Posts 11712
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/19/2014

swingingRichard

Re: strawpatch post# 16594

Monday, 09/24/2018 6:30:53 PM

Monday, September 24, 2018 6:30:53 PM

Post# of 17377
LMAO - they validated themselves. Hilarious.

Not enough information? There's no information in that idiotic pump PR.

Marshall's got no clue.

Easy-Peasy:
Amount of water needed is related to the pressure. The energy requirement for just the water is related to how high the water has to be lifted + the inherent losses.

This is a simple physics problem, one I've worked out and posted on this board. One can ignore all the losses in the pumping mechanisms and there is still not enough energy to turn a profit.

https://twitter.com/ScotFaber - don't worry. It's an alias.

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up