InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1131
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/12/2014

Re: btm post# 16596

Monday, 09/24/2018 1:46:56 PM

Monday, September 24, 2018 1:46:56 PM

Post# of 17377
But, more to the point, why come out with this now? Just when it looks like maybe, just maybe, SWET's going to do something the way it should be done, i.e., perform real world testing, it comes out with this BS based on computer modeling by goodness knows who: SWET

announced today the final calculations of the energy requirements necessary to deliver water to the top of the proposed Downdraft Energy Tower in San Luis, Arizona was validated by the operation of the water pumping and spray delivery system installed at its 400 foot Pilot Downdraft Tower.

The consulting fluid dynamics experts for the Arizona Tower designed the water pumping and spray delivery system for the Pilot Tower incorporating the same guidelines as the Arizona Tower adjusting for the required amount of water flow and lifting heights. Based on the evidence, the energy required to lift the water at the Arizona Tower to produce each 30,000 Megawatt Hours will be only 233 Megawatt Hours.

SWET, by its own admission has not conducted any operations at the test site other than to turn it on for a few minutes and has no actual results to speak of -- shoot, it apparently doesn't even have a tunnel or a turbine. So, what "evidence" is there and how has anything even come close to being "validated"?

Go ahead kids ... keep drinking the koolaid. Ummmm, tastes great, right?

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.