BioAmber Inc fka BIOAQ

[GhengisJohn]

Yep, #2 does have some of the right elements. Might even explain some of PWCs errors as they try to pull all the different parts together while trying to keep everything on the DL.

If PWC really is trying to stick to a deal that really does the best for all stakeholders, maybe the contingent future payments include suppliers and services they will need when they resume operations. Even with a higher return product alongside BA succinic acid, they might need to recover some goodwill.

I still don't see anything to account for reviving the shares other than that they are part of BioAmberInc and happens independent of the CCCA. Otherwise, i don't see how it can be done legally with the paper trail the DD this board has generated.