Tampa, Tampa, Tampa...so blind...you said;
"I am just an ignorant contractor who still believes in a profit from this company. ....not one of the nay sayers has been able to provide even one single shred of evidence to prove me wrong!"
Tampa there's been plenty of evidence presented by the company. I can't fathom how you fail to see these things. It doesn't take much thought. What was forecasted would happen by the "nay sayers" had come to fruition in the past couple of weeks which further supports their sentiments about Grifco. The loudest cheerleaders of Grifco had dropped out, sold their positions, or turned on the company. That doesn't bode well for the yeah-sayers. However, I applaud your stubborn-optimisim despite the fallability.
I see you didn't do your homework regarding the significance of CTT spin-off. You're the kind of person that can't extrapolate from facts but need to be hit in the head with "evidence". So here is a comment made by Jerry Swinford as told to me by one of former Grifco investors who sold out his position.
"I called Jerry Swinford today and he told me the following:
(1) He told me that Grifco has a terrible reputation in the industry and CTT's clients will not do business with him, or many of them, because clients are afraid the products will be made by Grifco;
(2) Grifco has no value except for Global Oil Tools;
(3) He has uncovering things that he does not want to discuss but wishes he never got involved in this thing;"
These were Jerry Swinfords comments. Now does this clarify the rift between JD and JS? Do you see now the significance of why CTT has to spin-off in order to survive? If you think the comments above are B.S., go back and re-read some of the comments made by other posters who confirmed the above statements through their observations during their visit with JD and JS.
