InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 936
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2010

Re: MackG post# 241128

Saturday, 09/15/2018 11:53:59 AM

Saturday, September 15, 2018 11:53:59 AM

Post# of 403022
MackG, What you say would work if the p2b trial would have been your usual orderly clinical trial. We have ample evidence that it was not.

I hazard a guess that last summer IPIX/CRO had sizable gaps in data from early enrollment making inference impossible - a situation where you can't absolutely rule out that you are looking at unblinded data comprised mostly of subjects on prurisol (or placebo). Plus not having a complete info from early enrollment would have made any interim report an exercise in futility:

"We are reporting interim results based on a non-random sample covering about 45 % of the subjects (70 % of enrollment) that have completed the treatment so far. Arms are not yet as balanced as we hope they will be in the final report ..." ---> Red hot roar from certain corners of STAT/TheStreet: "LEO IS CHERRY PICKING DATA !!!!!!!!!" And they would have been justified (well, sorta).

As I said, just a guess. But, the fact that they DID NOT CAN the trial then and there gives me some hope. As far as I know clinical trial contracts with CROs usually include some kind of early termination clause(s).

"I would rather have questions that can't be answered than answers that can't be questioned." Richard P. Feynman

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IPIX News