InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 842
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2017

Re: monocle post# 41534

Thursday, 09/13/2018 10:40:29 PM

Thursday, September 13, 2018 10:40:29 PM

Post# of 113486
I feel I owe you a response. My posts have been toxic to this board since my initial criticism of the Ricketts letter. I don’t wish to simply state my position, that gives me nothing more than a platform. I wish only to have dialogue and debate over various positions to engage a deeper thinking. I want my position challenged, and as such I challenge others. That dialogue is not possible here. A challenge is refuted with insults and preposterous suggestions. Apparently I am LCP, Advocate, and Tim Worstall all rolled into one.

I first invested in this company almost two years ago. I don’t desire someone to reaffirm my position. I assume it to be obvious an investor knows the positive aspects of a company. I desire a challenge to my position. I want to know why bears believe I am wrong, to ensure I am properly evaluating the holding.

I am also self aware enough to know when I am unwanted. If I receive no benefit and my presence is discouraged, then the appropriate thing to do is leave.

If I wore my boots to a dinner party and the other patrons complained about my attire then I wouldn’t try to convince them otherwise. I would respect their wishes to cater to a specific crowd that does not include me and then excuse myself, hence I ask to be excused. If you believe this mine will be built, and you’d like to further converse with me, then let’s talk in the electrical room.

I did commit to providing Australian Mines projections on the the scandium market. You will see one last post from me when their FS is released.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NB News