InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 685
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/05/2014

Re: Jh5142 post# 355

Thursday, 09/13/2018 9:07:36 PM

Thursday, September 13, 2018 9:07:36 PM

Post# of 1912
Thanks. UDF doesn’t mention loan losses in the damages section, so I think that’s good.

As a layman, I think UDF’s case looks good. But, I realize that I don’t know anything about the law, so I’m not counting on getting anything from the lawsuit.

Just to play devil’s advocate, assume Bass doesn’t go public, but just makes the SEC and FBI aware of his suspicions. The SEC still issues Wells notices, the FBI still raids UDF’s offices, and UDF still goes nearly 4 years without publishing audited financials. In that scenario, don’t you think the banks would still have pulled UDF’s credit, borrowers would have fled, etc?

If you think that scenario is plausible, then how do you determine what damages are due to Bass? I’m assuming Bass can’t be held responsible for the actions of the SEC and FBI. Even if he misrepresented the data to them, don’t they have a responsibility to do their own research before raiding offices? (Maybe not...I really don’t know)
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.