InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 1134
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/29/2016

Re: Bidsmaker1 post# 65742

Wednesday, 09/12/2018 2:57:33 PM

Wednesday, September 12, 2018 2:57:33 PM

Post# of 173089
It's a symbiotic relationship. Both need each other, and arguably the company need shareholders more than shareholders need a company.

With that being said, there are times companies need to take actions that have an adverse impact on shareholders. Restructuring a company the way RNVA is proceeding is a good example of that. However, there's a limit to how much BS shareholders will tolerate.

But this whole discussion started with a poster asking if technically the value of shares remain the same after a R/S. I responded that technically that's a true statement. However, that doesn't automatically translate into a good (or bad) outcome for shareholders. It depends on what actions the company take after the R/S.

And to your point, the actions the company takes post R/S may be good for the company but not for the shareholders. Time will tell.

My issue is posters who express unequivocally that RNVA doing a R/S is going to be a good thing for shareholders. That is not a factual statement.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RNVA News