The threat of SEC investigation falsely posted here is not a new tactic. It has been definitively disproven by the SEC’s own policy that such information would never be disclosed yet the false information was repeated, and doubled down on that “investigation is in progress at the LA office”, “I have been advised not to disclose further information” etc and veiled threats remain posted against shareholders on this board.
It is reminiscent of previous tactics with false information that Cathy Lerman, an attorney in Florida was investigating and bringing action against the company. To review, she brought a lawsuit against Renuen, now bankrupt. I have no involvement and little personal knowledge of the specific claims other than what is in the filings, of what the Renuen company did or did not do. What was very clear however was that this supposed respected attorney and “officer of the court” was bringing legal action against the company and simultaneously her police officer husband wasposting false online reviews and defamatory information about the company during this process, resulting in a federal racketeering complaint (RICO statute) that wasn’t fully addressed since the company ran out of money, just as she intended. Luckily for her it was before her deeds could be fully exposed.
Here was an associated threat posted against me regarding her investigation of ROTH and my response to the issue from April 2017:
The threat: "You should be afraid of an investigation by her..." My response:
I have no cause for fear. Nonwithstanding your threat and previous false statements about me, I am a shareholder that posts publicly verifiable information about ROTH and my opinions based on the Sucanon studies, as is my right.
The only concern I have, which appears well founded, is that unethical and most likely criminal folks like Lerman will take a page out of the previous playbook and ruin this company using false information due to a personal grudge. That is not consistent with the description "one of the most respected shareholder rights attorneys in the country". It is behavior of a common thug, and a scary proposition for someone who is as you stated "an officer of the court".
I submit that there are many similarities in how ROTH is currently attacked with verifiably false information posted with the stated intent to “scare people away”. It is done by people like Lerman who feel the need to destroy others with false information and accusation rather than using due process. Some examples include:
-False announcement of an SEC investigation
-False statements about insolvency
-Use of a published Consumer Reports article modified and posted with false information to attempt to smear ROTH and its product Sucanon
-False accusations that India partner Canagen is a fake company located in a diner
-False statements that “hundreds of millions of shares issued to insiders at. zero cost”
-False information attempting to discredit Sucanon studies and the researchers despite consistent good results over many years
See a pattern emerging?
These are but a few examples of a consistent strategy by Lerman and her ilk to ruin a company. She did it before as above and similar tactics are being employed here. If the facts are that Sucanon works based on publicly verifiable studies and information published in Diabetologica, the journal of the EASD where the Sucanon study in 99 prediabetics showed normalization of HbA1C in 81% within 12 weeks, that must be countered by any means available: false information, threats, or whatever it takes to ruin the company. Just look at the evidence, it’s all out there for you to see.
Jacob J. Rosenblum on what every lawyer knows.
“If the facts are against you, hammer the law. If the law is against you, hammer the facts. If the fact and the law are against you, hammer opposing counsel."
