Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[quilt]

Data I want to know if we may be on the same page sir.

1- The estoppel issue on the reverse, am i correct that its only on the 3 previously not appealed patents Judge Prost seemed to bring that up early on- i don't remember the numbers of those three.

and if so

It be secondary to the RPI issue of course, because if the RPI pans out as the language shows it should,

We note, however, that we have issued opinions since the Board issued its final written decisions that clarify the meaning of the term “real party in interest” in the context of § 315(b). See Applications in Internet Time, LLC v. RPX Corp., 897 F.3d 1336, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (explaining that determining whether a party is a real party in interest “demands a flexible approach that takes into account both equitable and practical considerations, with an eye toward determining whether the non-party is a clear beneficiary that has a preexisting, established relationship with the petitioner”);


2- Were in a better leverage position possibly prior to PTAB discovery


3- Is it possible, just possible that Bungie takes Mr. Kidren's PR release as an olive branch to come tot he table?

Cut n Paste answers if easier, i am just curious if i am close here.