InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 193
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/22/2018

Re: Grouse Hunter post# 29426

Wednesday, 08/29/2018 3:57:36 PM

Wednesday, August 29, 2018 3:57:36 PM

Post# of 51534
correct.

the objections would have to be to the change in control. it's outlined in the terms of authorization starting on page 165 here:

https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/06/f34/ord4028.pdf

see part D.

i'm assuming this clause is inserted for the case of protecting any public ownership if the company weren't private, or to protect private investors if they want to make an appeal.

time for appeal to prevent authorization has already passed and is not the reason the hearing period is in place. there have already been objections to the impact of the project in the gulf which were rejected.