Wednesday, August 29, 2018 3:57:36 PM
the objections would have to be to the change in control. it's outlined in the terms of authorization starting on page 165 here:
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/06/f34/ord4028.pdf
see part D.
i'm assuming this clause is inserted for the case of protecting any public ownership if the company weren't private, or to protect private investors if they want to make an appeal.
time for appeal to prevent authorization has already passed and is not the reason the hearing period is in place. there have already been objections to the impact of the project in the gulf which were rejected.
Recent TGLO News
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2024 06:57:53 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/07/2023 08:01:27 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2023 04:16:21 PM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM
ECGI Holdings Announces LOI to Acquire Pacific Saddlery to Capitalize on $12.72 Billion Market Potential • ECGI • Jun 13, 2024 9:50 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc. Announces Major Strategic Advancements and Shareholder Updates • CAFI • Jun 13, 2024 8:45 AM