InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 441
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/27/2017

Re: ubmmg post# 78507

Wednesday, 08/22/2018 10:41:45 AM

Wednesday, August 22, 2018 10:41:45 AM

Post# of 108191
Could be. I always felt the 10M dilution earlier this year fits into it somehow, either by intentionally giving a certain party greater percentage ownership or as a takeover defense but I'm not sure which. I also think cases like Edelman were actually just short term flips that were actually for profit rather than loss, but interpreted as a loss by the public because we aren't privy to all the details. I also think all the "mismanagement" over the last few years and "shelving" AXAL fits in somehow, either because the eventual buyer doesn't want it or simply to keep prices lower for longer and buy time for more shares to be cornered. I suspect this was put in motion by DOC and we're just being babysat since.

Admittedly, a stretch. But highly efficient if true and I like to think we're playing with smart guys that value efficiency.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent ADXS News