![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Monday, August 20, 2018 4:51:47 PM
Since the deal about that with Cantor Colburn, there was no need for dilution. So it stopped.
Of course things can change in the future. But if GERS wins the lawsuit, they have as much growth as they can ever wish for.
So why dilute for growth while that’s still the case?
Yes, if GERS would lose the lawsuit, things would probably be very different. But I don’t think the parents will be worth much then, so it would just implode. No dilution then also, just the end of GERS I guess.
So the question is, why dilute if there is nothing to be gained by that?
Okay that could buy other companies, but don’t you think they would wait until after the lawsuit to do so, because they might have many milions to spend then?
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM
VAYK Exited Caribbean Investments for $320,000 Profit • VAYK • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Successful Flotation Cell Test at Bishop Gold Mill, Inyo County, California • NBRI • Jun 27, 2024 9:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. and Hemp Emu Announce Strategic Partnership to Enhance CBD Product Manufacturing • BLEG • Jun 27, 2024 8:30 AM
POET Wins "Best Optical AI Solution" in 2024 AI Breakthrough Awards Program • POET • Jun 26, 2024 10:09 AM
HealthLynked Promotes Bill Crupi to Chief Operating Officer • HLYK • Jun 26, 2024 8:00 AM