InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 25
Posts 5233
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/02/2011

Re: Cobra Kai post# 47165

Monday, 08/20/2018 4:51:47 PM

Monday, August 20, 2018 4:51:47 PM

Post# of 52845
Dilution at GERS was never for growth, but to pay for the lawsuits pending.
Since the deal about that with Cantor Colburn, there was no need for dilution. So it stopped.
Of course things can change in the future. But if GERS wins the lawsuit, they have as much growth as they can ever wish for.
So why dilute for growth while that’s still the case?
Yes, if GERS would lose the lawsuit, things would probably be very different. But I don’t think the parents will be worth much then, so it would just implode. No dilution then also, just the end of GERS I guess.
So the question is, why dilute if there is nothing to be gained by that?

Okay that could buy other companies, but don’t you think they would wait until after the lawsuit to do so, because they might have many milions to spend then?