InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 183
Posts 51092
Boards Moderated 10
Alias Born 12/20/2004

Re: pb_trading post# 16339

Sunday, 08/19/2018 12:16:49 AM

Sunday, August 19, 2018 12:16:49 AM

Post# of 26959

Really it's the terminology, they weren't aware of any public information about a reverse merger.

They can't say they are aware of confidential, undisclosed, insider information about a reverse merger.


Nope again. Veyo is well within any kind of disclosure to have mentioned confidential process.
All they had to say was we are aware of confidential information concerning the company which we can not discuss. That would not be improper at all.
But they didn't. Creating all sorts of scenarios about what they DIDN'T say is disingenuous to shareholders and potential investors.