Blum Holdings Inc (BLMH)

[IndustryParticipant]

No. I'm a realist who addresses what is.

He’s a numbers guy, and the numbers don’t look good. Your an operations / visionary and the vision looks good.

I’m an edge master, I like like this slot machine win / loose no big.

Yes. And "operations" factor in......operations.

I know of no "numbers guy's" who completely ignore any and everything any given company has in progress.

I'll once again offer anyone yet another challenge:
Provide any financial institution that will take the position 6+ separate operations commencing within 6 months of today, quite possibly exceeding $30MM annually, 6 months from today, affecting margins and cogs dramatically, that such is irrelevant and has no affect on a company, and not worthy of discussion or consideration.

Because I can't name one.

6:
NV 30k cultivation (multi ton) currently entering week 12 of veg. ($5-10MM annual revenue about to begin would be relevant ;).

2 SA retail permits. When construction complete, operations may commence. $10MM+ annual revenues commencing shortly with facility under construction would also, indeed, be relevant....)
1 SA cultivation, manufacturing, and distribution site.
1 SA (Carnegie) not included as stated possible alternate purpose for property. (But asset with potential 11MM sale would be relevant ;)
1. Sale of NV Western (6.25MM cash in next 60 days would be relevant as well ;)
1. NV manufacturing awaiting for approval to commence operations. (licensed and constructed multi MM facility awaiting approval to commence/day 1 would , yet again, be "relevant".

Note I excluded quite a bit, such as additional NV retail permits, that the co. has stated an interest in, as we sit between 2 stakeholder only processes.
I also excluded 1 cultivation for Carnegie due to uncertainty, but due to potential alternate use, would be relevant to "numbers guys".
I also excluded NV SS 40k site stated as in design and engineering, as this doesn't present any firm date due to ground not being broke, so wouldn't be something given weight currently.
I excluded NJ as well, as until a victory or position is firmly claimed, that would not be worthy of note by "numbers guys".

Of further note would be additional NV licenses (in hand) would represent immediate significant value. ("Numbers guys" might find an additional XXMM relevant......you'd think.....as would be WeHo licensure, as would be NJ, all highly likely per the regulatory agencies to be decided in the next 90 days.

Any individual or organization who attempts to provide a "sound, reasonable, unbiased" analysis while simultaneously refusing to take into consideration all factors, all current activities, and additional revenues from multiple sources occurring over the next several months, isn't.