InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 92
Posts 10136
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/05/2010

Re: SooS416 post# 125369

Saturday, 08/18/2018 3:01:47 PM

Saturday, August 18, 2018 3:01:47 PM

Post# of 158739
The SEC may find that of interest...

And looking at it further they just didn't book the other $21k at all and would seem to have pocketed it.

The increase in debt is $75k and not the $96k as disclosed in the note. And the loan is shown on RBII books at the 96k which they are representing as trade AR.

Something shady going on as it would seem that someone took $21k in cash and simply did not record the transaction on PAOGs books, so RBII shows the full AR amount yet PAOG only shows $75k in associated liabilty, that is a major problem.