InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 173
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/03/2015

Re: rwandrw post# 1305

Friday, 08/17/2018 2:44:51 PM

Friday, August 17, 2018 2:44:51 PM

Post# of 2470
A note regarding test flying -- Supposedly the safety line was *also* required because with the configuration of these vehicles at the time, a single engine failure would cause either vehicle to invert instantly.

This makes perfect sense with the M400 prototype, which only had four engines at the time (one at each corner). I'm sure this (along with power limitations/lack of availability of two rotor engines) is why the M400 was never flown manned.

The issue isn't quite so clear cut with the saucer, but then again it was also flying with what was probably a much more primitive control system. So a single engine failure would still have been pretty hairy.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.