InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 1673
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/08/2018

Re: twaflyer1 post# 47077

Tuesday, 08/14/2018 11:24:21 PM

Tuesday, August 14, 2018 11:24:21 PM

Post# of 52840
Multiple violations of the laws that the SEC enforces do warrant an investigation, especially when a shareholder files a complaint, as I did months ago. It's quite possible that other GERS investors have filed their own complaints, and without any notice on any medium. Did you forget that the Greenshift Corporation still hasn't filed the 10-K for 2016 (or any other legally-required form) since then the third quarter of 2016?

These omitted forms have prevented every current GERS shareholder and every potential GERS shareholder from using any due dilligence to make an investment decision.

A lawsuit could even be filed, saying that financial losses (or missed opportunities to make profits) were caused by Kevin's gross negligence and the fact that the information in the Q3 2016 10-Q report is now false information because of Kevin's transfer of one or more Greenshift patents to Attis since the third quarter of 2016.

The hypothetical lawsuit could also ask for compensation for the expected higher value of GERS stock, based on the forward earnings from the license revenue. This revenue, and the bottom-line earnings that this hypothetical shareholder expected that Greenshift would receive from the licensees, is, instead, going to the bottom line of Attis industries.