InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 172
Posts 20643
Boards Moderated 5
Alias Born 09/06/2010

Re: Captain Black Bob Blanco post# 26567

Tuesday, 08/14/2018 7:48:02 PM

Tuesday, August 14, 2018 7:48:02 PM

Post# of 47730
http://www.sec.gov/structureddata/what-is-structured-data

All SEC registrants are now required to include XBRL tagged financial statements in their filings (domestic companies like Mexus are required to provide them on both a quarterly and annual basis, while foreign private issuers are only required to provide them annually).

This is Mexus' most recent annual XBRL financial statements (again, filed LATE).

http://www.sec.gov/cgi-bin/viewer?action=view&cik=1355677&accession_number=0001078782-18-000707&xbrl_type=v

The filing of the Form NT 10-Q does NOT grant Mexus additional time to file the XBRL. Which means Mexus is, again, non-compliant. The following is a rule interpretation direct from the SEC:

Question: Can a filer rely on Exchange Act Rule 12b-25 to extend the due date of an Interactive Data File?

Answer: No. Rule 12b-25 has been amended to state that its provisions do not apply to Interactive Data Files. Filers that are unable to submit or post Interactive Data Files when required must comply with the hardship exemption requirements of either Rule 201 (temporary hardship exemption) or Rule 202 (continuing hardship exemption) of Regulation S-T. However, filers that are unable to file their traditional format financial statements by the prescribed due date — but qualify for the additional time permitted under Rule 12b-25 and file their traditional format financial statements within that time — would not be required to submit and post their interactive data until the traditional format financial statements are filed. [May 29, 2009]

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/interactivedatainterp.htm

Mexus filed the Form NT to get an extra 5 days, and then screwed it up by filing the non-compliant 10-Q. They should have waited until the XBRL was ready, THEN filed them together as required by the SEC. By filing the "traditional format financial statements" without the required XBRL, Mexus is, AGAIN, non-compliant!

Again, PT is obviously unqualified to run a public company in any way, shape or form.