InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,487.03
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,430.40
(
0.14%
)
Dow Jones
38,834.86
(
0.15%
)
Brent Oil
84.60
(
-0.22%
)
Bitcoin
65,144.81
(
0.01%
)
Post# of 163718
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

RealDutch

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 116
Posts 35648
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 04/19/2012

RealDutch

Member Level

Re: Martin79x post# 143444

Tuesday, 08/14/2018 6:27:19 PM

Tuesday, August 14, 2018 6:27:19 PM

Post# of 163718

Isnt it better to issue new share to garrett to settle the previously toxic note instead of issuing millions of shares and dumping it on the market to be able to repay the note?



No. Because even if they settle it for $1 or $1.50 (a sginificant premium) it would still hold us back the moment the share price comes close to that price. Which seems like a good deal for us now, but you'll regret it later on.

They will repay Garrett in cash. Which is interesting. Apparently they think the money will come from somewhere. Otherwise it would be much easier to settle it in shares.

---

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up