Monday, August 13, 2018 1:21:45 PM
Problem with a compromise agreement is that the petitioner consists of a variety of activist groups -- and trying to herd them into an agreement may be difficult and time consuming.
I'm not real keen on the reasons cited by EPA Region 9 for the delay -- about having to consult with EPA Headquarters in DC on several of the appeal issues -- primarily, the Indian consultation issue and NEPA equivalency and cumulative effects issues -- and having to consult with EPA Region 8 on possible parallels between similar raised issues with a UIC permit Region 8 tried to issue. It's not a good sign if multiple layers of EPA counsel and program staff have to coordinate on responses. The old "too many chefs spoil the broth" concern.
I really hope Excelsior Mining can reach a reasonable, QUICK compromise with the appeal petitioners so that we can proceed forward with financing and construction. Operative words -- reasonable, and quick.
Avant Technologies Equipping AI-Managed Data Center with High Performance Computing Systems • AVAI • May 10, 2024 8:00 AM
VAYK Discloses Strategic Conversation on Potential Acquisition of $4 Million Home Service Business • VAYK • May 9, 2024 9:00 AM
Bantec's Howco Awarded $4.19 Million Dollar U.S. Department of Defense Contract • BANT • May 8, 2024 10:00 AM
Element79 Gold Corp Successfully Closes Maverick Springs Option Agreement • ELEM • May 8, 2024 9:05 AM
Kona Gold Beverages, Inc. Achieves April Revenues Exceeding $586,000 • KGKG • May 8, 2024 8:30 AM
Epazz plans to spin off Galaxy Batteries Inc. • EPAZ • May 8, 2024 7:05 AM