......a little late in the game to bring this up, mr. haynes/SIMON........
.......WHY IN THE WORLD IS THERE A PHONY SIDE ISSUE PRESENTED IN THE APPEAL OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION...............gotta divvy up the ITR...............sorry.................and the reality is, no other entity in the TAA paid in taxes....................WTF........and Martinez only ruled that the ITR was the bank's, but that the case should be returned to the BK CT for processing...........that's it......
.....'TROJAN HORSE' pleading at this stage is contemptuous, imo.........it's that footnote 3 that haynes is trying to remove from the record, imo...........................dude better be careful with a trick like this...........AT LEAST THE REQUEST WAS NOT "en banc"........so, the A/CT clerk might just get a judge to say "request denied".............or the court might decide to rehear the mofo............BIZARRE...................
......as with all of western united..................FREAKSHOW and another 6 months of nothing-ness.................................
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.