A question if I may... even if this lawyer did have an association with ECOS, would he be allowed to tell you anything about it? Correct me if I'm wrong, but any information relating to ECOS would count as insider information - and he should know this already if he's dealt with publicly traded companies.
I wonder why he would decide to incorporate a name that matches ECOS exactly. It's all just very odd especially since he's met MS in the past... obviously he knew he might be creating some drama by taking a name that used to be incorporated by MS a year ago..? Let alone in a state where they are currently doing their business in too.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.