InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 71
Posts 7941
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/29/2015

Re: shell3 post# 3906

Monday, 08/06/2018 10:08:23 PM

Monday, August 06, 2018 10:08:23 PM

Post# of 16696
That would be a retroactive vote to approve a deal with Nash Pharmacueticals without shareholder knowledge. I'm not an attorney but I'd bet that's illegal. They have to bring it to an online vote (attendance not required) with a control number provided to ALL shareholders. It ain't over til it's over.



Thx for weighing in Shell. People look up to you (including me) and anytime you can weigh in on behalf of us common shareholders, it's a good day. We just want what's fair and just. Common shareholders have made the sacrifice and management has already made a ton of money at our expense. Now they want to do it in perpetuity. It's pure evil.

/////AMG

P.S. I'm not saying a deal with Nash Pharmacueticals is a bad deal period. What I'm saying is it definitely IS NOT worth anything close to what is being proposed and management knows it. A 5 for 4 Reverse Split is a 20% scalping of common shareholders. A 3 for 2 Reverse Split is a One-third scalping of common shareholders. Ho back to my last post and apply the analogy.




It's A Real Movie



Take Your Best Screenshot