InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 142
Posts 1408
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2015

Re: janice shell post# 15048

Monday, 08/06/2018 1:50:49 AM

Monday, August 06, 2018 1:50:49 AM

Post# of 52224
Yep its "legal" because they are a MM. What you say is also true about failures to deliver but I'm going to stick with greed and go with the scenario which by far would net HMNYs lenders the most money. Its a no brainer, why wouldn't they? No logical reason not to naked short, makes them tons more money. I don't like the whole thing. I don't like companies that dilute like this and are horrible to shareholders and I think toxic lenders are even worse. I think personally they are greedy corrupt 2nd rate MMs that feed off of the weak. Whos worse the drug addict or the drug pusher? Companies like HMNY are the addict and lenders like HMNY has are the pusher. Most will say the drug pusher is worse. Regardless its all wrong. However because of greed HMNY's lender will give HMNY a pps boost when they so choose for the reason I explained before and then short it to death again and just like all the rest will leave it for dead once they have gotten all they can get from their addict. This is extremely predictable and frankly not very hard for a bystander who's seen the movie hundreds of times before predict whats going to happen. If the company wants to be an addict and toxic lenders want to take advantage then best thing a trader like me can do is know the process and make as accurate predictions as possible.

Knowledge + risk taking = prosperity