InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 142
Posts 1408
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/09/2015

Re: janice shell post# 15044

Monday, 08/06/2018 1:32:06 AM

Monday, August 06, 2018 1:32:06 AM

Post# of 52224
I've seen it a hundred times. A company with crappy financials gets a loan from a toxic lender. Toxic lender knowing there will be dilution shorts ahead of the dilution usually 3 or so days ahead of it. Process continues until either lender who is a MM decides they want to make money on upside for a short period of time stops the naked shorting or company stops diluting. Failures to deliver show up because on settlement dates the naked shorting MM doesn't have all of what they shorted days before yet to deliver. As dilution continues they deliver shares but make a killing. Here shorting at 21 and deliver shares at 6. Short at 6 and deliver at 50 cents. They'd be stupid not to do it and since they are a "MM" they get away with it because they "make a market". As a toxic lender there can be no other way to make greater money then to do this and so it is of little doubt that they do what makes them the absolute most money. Lastly they will flip a switch at some point and HMNY will run for a few days because again they make more going both ways, especially once they got their fill on downside. Rise it up, pump it up and make money up for a few days then short again with a higher pps to make gains shorting from again which is more money again. This is all about money money money and no one can tell me the toxic lenders are not going to do everything to get the most money. What I explained is how they can get the most money.

Knowledge + risk taking = prosperity