Creative Medical Technology Holdings Inc (CELZ)

[phil anthropist]

To your point GG and I don't disagree but I think CELZ 10Q amendment was more of a housekeeping issue that wasn't perceived as a negative. Reclassifying a $12,500 note reflected in the footnotes is getting deep in the weeds of transparency. I wonder how many companies would just let it go? Especially on the OTC.

IMO I interpret this as positive and for those such as yourself and the others that can an do understand filings I think you agree. Unfortunately there are those that react on misinformation.

CELZ is reporting like a NASDAQ. A culture that helps as the company moves forward.

Thanks for everyone's great DD. Makes for productive dialogue.

Again, all about the timing

CELZ....