InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 251682
Next 10
Followers 827
Posts 119542
Boards Moderated 15
Alias Born 09/05/2002

Re: mcbio post# 220318

Thursday, 08/02/2018 10:00:11 AM

Thursday, August 02, 2018 10:00:11 AM

Post# of 251682

AGN/MOLN.SW—Won't the less frequent dosing (particularly quarterly) allow them to compete to a degree in spite of the numerically higher rate of inflammation, particularly if they discount the price relative to Lucentis? Is the incidence of ~15% of intraocular inflammation events truly a big issue for abicipar?

The 15% inflammation rate renders the current formulation of the drug commercially nonviable, IMHO. AMD drugs coming soon from NVS and REGN will have quarterly or longer dosing intervals, so that in itself won’t be able to make AGN’s Abicipar competitive.

…the other interesting thing from the [AGN] PR is the reference that: "We will continue to review these data including inflammation findings and are working on further optimizing the abicipar formulation.” Are they planning an additional Phase 3 trial with a new formulation?

AGN is running an open-label safety stuffy with the new formulation, with the goal of to getting the inflammation rate down to low/mid single digits. Thus, the Abicipar BLA will consist of efficacy data from the old formulation and safety data from the new formulation, which may ruffle some feathers at the FDA.

“The efficient-market hypothesis may be
the foremost piece of B.S. ever promulgated
in any area of human knowledge!”

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.