Followers | 61 |
Posts | 13510 |
Boards Moderated | 2 |
Alias Born | 01/13/2011 |
Thursday, July 26, 2018 3:11:36 PM
Apples and oranges. I believe the company "infringing" the Trademark was merely using it for the name of their business, not the product.
Big difference than if you started sell Paris Hilton products, stealing the brand name. It would be much easier to prove damages as they would be the amount of sales you generated on those products. Again, much different than what is happening in the Bravada case.
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM