As I said, Raging Bull II. Of the last 120 posts, 90 of them are from blatant opponents of Rim.
You are losing the perspective of those who actually research the company from sources in addition to the filings, and you won't hear what they learn. Too bad for you and the others you influence. What we should be discussing would be the following type of things.
How much better is the tech than VDSL2
How hard will it be to market Cupria if companies are already establised with the target customers.
Can the leadership and sales force get the job done? Why or why not.
Will standards be an issue.
What kind of revenue can we expect in 2007.
What other applications can be added to the Cupria family of chips.
Is a gofernment contract still probable.
What kind of influence do both Tan and Wojcik have with target customers.
Will success with Telco's delivering the triple play over copper have any effect on Verizon's plans.
How much difference does it make having VoIP, WiFi and Router software on the marketability of Cupria.
Will more financing be needed.
And on, and on, and on.
Instead, 95% of what is discussed on IHUB is totally irrelevant to what the shareholders need to know at this time.
If your goal is to keep people from buying or to encourage people to sell, you are probably accomplished your goal with some people. Just remember that when Rim has a digit or more to the left of the decimal point, you will have hurt a few people.
Also, the majority of people who are negative here, have not visited the Rim office, nor have spoken to anyone at Rim or anyone on the Board Of Directors for probably 2 or 3 years at least. Nor have they been to a shareholders meeting in the last 3 years. If you call that good DD, then that shows how clearly you are thinking.
No one will be able to compete with the quality of Rim's technology anytime soon, IMO, but the question at this time is, how well they will be able to market it.
AI
