InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 842
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2017

Re: Boilermaker1 post# 39511

Monday, 07/23/2018 2:06:53 PM

Monday, July 23, 2018 2:06:53 PM

Post# of 113454
You guys still don't get it. Everyone here understands Niocorp's "special chemical" position on scandium. Two other likely producers, both aiming at the same industries, do not share these views. Except for pricing, all three of these companies have very similar outlooks and strategies for the market. I'm not trying to debate this. The scandium market does not currently exist in a meaningful volume and only time will tell which predictions are more accurate.

I will not, however, sit back and watch others make false claims about other's plans and predictions in order to prop up NB. One poster purported that Niocorp planned a higher purity than another. This is provably false. A post this morning claimed SCY priced scandium in the same range as NB. Also provably false. If you are that confident in the pricing assumed by Matheson and NB, then why do so many on this board feel the need to continually make false comparisons? Why not call out these false claims and let Niocorps predictions stand on their own merits?
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NB News