InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 63
Posts 3433
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/11/2015

Re: solong post# 33933

Friday, 07/20/2018 6:40:22 PM

Friday, July 20, 2018 6:40:22 PM

Post# of 62742
25K Note

TXHDD Lawyer: Harvard Law grad and Illinois Super Lawyer from 2005 - 2018. What a team they’re building.https://profiles.superlawyers.com/illinois/chicago/lawyer/edward-w-feldman/b3f8abb2-0f31-4d23-b3f1-2739c18145c8.html

Noteholder Lawyer = YIKES!!! Look at the reputation of Attorney Adam Tracy who represents noteholder Einhaus.

“The Administrator's five-count Complaint alleged that Respondent engaged in multiple instances of misconduct in connection with his representation of five clients, primarily in foreclosure and loan modification matters. Each count charged that he failed to act with reasonable diligence and engaged in dishonest conduct. In various other counts he was charged with failing to properly communicate with clients; failing to expedite litigation; asserting frivolous proceedings or issues; failing to properly withdraw from a matter after being terminated; failing to protect his clients' interests after being terminated; making a false statement or offering false evidence to a tribunal; using means with no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden a third person; and engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

The Hearing Board found that Respondent failed to act with reasonable diligence with respect to all five clients and engaged in dishonest conduct with respect to four clients. As to three counts he failed to properly communicate with his clients and brought frivolous proceedings or motions. Respondent also failed to properly withdraw from litigation matters, failed to take steps to protect one client after he was terminated, made false statements to a tribunal, failed to expedite litigation, asserted issues to embarrass, delay or burden a third party, and engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice.

After considering the mitigating and aggravating factors and relevant case law, the Hearing Board recommended that Respondent be suspended for one year, with the last six months stayed by a one-year period of probation with conditions.”

http://www.iardc.org/HB_RB_Disp_Html.asp?id=12702
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent KOAN News