Andrea Electronics (ANDR)

[Champion79]

$AAPL "failed to establish that claims 4–11 and 39–46 of the ’345 patent are unpatentable."

The more DD I do, the more impressed I am with how legitimate this is. You can actually download the details of the case: https://portal.unifiedpatents.com/ptab/case/IPR2017-00626

"IPR2017-00626
Patent 6,363,345 B1
2
I. INTRODUCTION
We have jurisdiction to hear this inter partes review under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6, and this Final Written Decision is issued pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a)
and 37 C.F.R. § 42.73. For the reasons that follow, we determine that Apple
Inc. (“Petitioner”) has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claims
1–3, 12–25, 38, and 47 of U.S. Patent No. 6,363,345 B1 (Ex. 1001, “the
’345 patent”) are unpatentable, but has failed to establish that claims 4–11
and 39–46 of the ’345 patent are unpatentable."


Also, here’s an example of when $AAPL payed $626 million dollars after losing a patent case: https://money.cnn.com/2016/02/04/technology/apple-patent-lawsuit-virnetx/index.html


$ANDR