The Gravity in Charts:
In the stone ages...if a human threw a stone into the sky, they could (and would) observe it fall right back to earth. They would 100% truly know that there was "something" making the stone fall back to earth. They would see it with their own eyes. They would however not "FULLY" know about this stone falling back to earth. Truly knowing is not FULLY knowing. Think about this.
Now, observing something happen and simultaneously understanding why it happened are two completely different things. Charts are tools of observation for events that happen before our very eyes in real time and historical rearview. They do not, however, tell us the WHY of the thing happening with any modicum of accuracy.
It took Einstein "figuring" out gravity as the "why" the stone fell back to the earth. Brightest mind of his time and beyond and he applied all elements of his brain's mass to arriving at the why. The thing is, gravity is a force of several very FIXED factors and forces that don't change with time (let's not dive into the fact that the physical universe is actually in a state of expansion...). It took Einstein sorting fixed facts to arrive at a theory called gravity. He could test this theory every day by tossing an orange into the sky and watching it fall EVERY SINGLE TIME. Does anyone on this board who looks at charts know WITH CERTAINTY what direction CELZ will go every single day? What about when there is an accidental margin call on someone's account that purges 1/6th of a day's total volume and the stock gets kicked in the gonads? Do we call it a "required foreknown retest of blah blah blah" or do we call it what it is? An aberration on the path of a stock that has a reasonable but unknowable future trading in the hands of unpredictable humans by market manipulators that are like puppet masters pulling strings as we go. Don't get me wrong, I love the technical analysis as much as any simply due to my background; however, I've been living and working on this terrestrial ball for long enough to know that NO ONE is smart enough to know what direction a stock is going to go with any modicum of certainty, certainly on a day to day basis and maybe somewhat moreso on the longer-term. I'll leave this morning writing with this: Einstien was smart enough to consider his research of gravity and his conclusions thereof as a "theory" and the facts were fixed. It would behoove chartist's of infinitely variable stocks and their resulting pricing outcomes to boldly state that their observations much less occurrences of being "right" are merely THEORIES of applied observation with the massive fundamental understanding that the why the chart shows what it shows is 99.9999% bunk. It simply is.
As for CELZ today, it sure would be nice to test some new highs! And even if it gets manipulated down by 50%, I'll be sitting tight either way because my bet isn't placed on the day to day but the REASONABLE proposition that the business of CELZ and the particular team in place to execute it has a better than 50/50 chance of succeeding wildly. That said, it still is 50/50 because at the end of the day, week, year, decade, etc. CELZ will either make it or it won't. Just like any chart predictions for the day, the chance is 50/50 that whatever call is made will be right and maybe it will be many times within a day but still...50/50 = will or won't. Nothing more, nothing less.
VERY LONG and GETTING STRONG. $CELZ
-- Narrow is the way and few are those who find it. --
AI
