InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 40
Posts 13070
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/07/2012

Re: None

Thursday, 07/12/2018 9:27:35 AM

Thursday, July 12, 2018 9:27:35 AM

Post# of 59432
.......standard procedure, not surprised.........coulda waited another 20 days......a one page form...........who cares...............an appellate panel decides whether to request the "en banc" survey of all A/judges in the circuit.....

....probably a yawner................HOWEVER.........DANGER ZONE CITY FOR THE FDIC................because an A/judge could opine: "the THRIFT should not have been seized in the 1st place.........so the wrongful seizure renders the ITR claim to be without merit..........and one of these insightful judges might just want the RECEIVER to return the THRIFT to its rightful owner......(or the $3-billion dollar EQUIVALENT)........I'll be doggone..................

.......FDIC is gambling, imo.....................WE CONTROL THIS PROCESS, imo...........we need more legal MUSCLE.........and we ordered it, I hear.......

.....same old, same old.......................U.S. SUPREME COURT IS NEXT.............will happen, imo..................





Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.